Review



cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice  (Med Associates Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Med Associates Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Med Associates Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 97
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Med Associates Inc cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice
    Cued Fear Conditioning Tasks Ccfc Mice, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 75 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice  (Med Associates Inc)
    97
    Med Associates Inc cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice
    Cued Fear Conditioning Tasks Ccfc Mice, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning tasks ccfc mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued fear conditioning contextual  (AutoMate Scientific Inc)
    96
    AutoMate Scientific Inc cued fear conditioning contextual
    Cued Fear Conditioning Contextual, supplied by AutoMate Scientific Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning contextual/product/AutoMate Scientific Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning contextual - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued fear conditioning  (Med Associates Inc)
    97
    Med Associates Inc cued fear conditioning
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Cued Fear Conditioning, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued and contextual fear conditioning and inhibitory avoidance procedures  (Reichelt Chemietechnik)
    90
    Reichelt Chemietechnik cued and contextual fear conditioning and inhibitory avoidance procedures
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Cued And Contextual Fear Conditioning And Inhibitory Avoidance Procedures, supplied by Reichelt Chemietechnik, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued and contextual fear conditioning and inhibitory avoidance procedures/product/Reichelt Chemietechnik
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued and contextual fear conditioning and inhibitory avoidance procedures - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    contextual and cued fear conditioning  (CH Instruments)
    90
    CH Instruments contextual and cued fear conditioning
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Contextual And Cued Fear Conditioning, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual and cued fear conditioning/product/CH Instruments
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    contextual and cued fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued fear conditioning contextual  (Med Associates Inc)
    96
    Med Associates Inc cued fear conditioning contextual
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Cued Fear Conditioning Contextual, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning contextual/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning contextual - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    time fz1 for contextual and cued fear conditioning test software  (Ohara Co Ltd)
    90
    Ohara Co Ltd time fz1 for contextual and cued fear conditioning test software
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Time Fz1 For Contextual And Cued Fear Conditioning Test Software, supplied by Ohara Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/time fz1 for contextual and cued fear conditioning test software/product/Ohara Co Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    time fz1 for contextual and cued fear conditioning test software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued fear conditioning standard delay contextual  (Med Associates Inc)
    97
    Med Associates Inc cued fear conditioning standard delay contextual
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Cued Fear Conditioning Standard Delay Contextual, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued fear conditioning standard delay contextual/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued fear conditioning standard delay contextual - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cued and contextual fear conditioning test  (Porsolt)
    90
    Porsolt cued and contextual fear conditioning test
    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear <t>conditioning</t> test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.
    Cued And Contextual Fear Conditioning Test, supplied by Porsolt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cued and contextual fear conditioning test/product/Porsolt
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cued and contextual fear conditioning test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear conditioning test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.

    Journal: Genes

    Article Title: Effects of Paraquat, Dextran Sulfate Sodium, and Irradiation on Behavioral and Cognitive Performance and the Gut Microbiome in A53T and A53T-L444P Mice.

    doi: 10.3390/genes15030282

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 11. (A) In the open field, activity levels were higher in A53T than A54T-L444P mice (F(1,81) = 4.091, * p = 0.046). (B) In the rotorod test, there was a genotype × treatment interaction (F(1,81) = 7.773, p = 0.007). DSS impaired rotorod performance in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 9.228, *** p = 0.004), but not in A53T mice. (C) DSS reduced spontaneous alternation in A53T-L444P mice (F(1,45) = 7.191, * p = 0.01). (D) A53T-L44P mice showed reduced activity levels in the Y-maze (F(1,81) = 5.336, * p = 0.023). (E) During the baseline period in the fear conditioning test, activity levels were lower in A53T-L44P than A53T mice (F(1,81) = 7.565, ** p = 0.007). (F) In males, A53T-L44P mice showed lower activity levels than A53T mice during the baseline period (F(1,41) = 6.727, * p = 0.013). (G) In females, there was a treatment × genotype interaction (F(1,40) = 4.168, p = 0.048). DSS increased activity level in A53T-L44P females (F(1,22) = 5.119, * p = 0.034). (H) For the freezing levels during the ISI, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 4.661, p = 0.034). (I) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the ISI (F(1,81) = 4.564, * p = 0.036). (J) When activity levels during the tones were analyzed, there was a genotype × treatment × sex interaction (F(1,81) = 8.199, p = 0.005). (K) A53T-L44P mice had lower activity levels than A53T mice during the contextual fear memory test (F(1,85) = 4.677, * p = 0.033). Circles: A53T; squares: A53T-L444P. Open symbols: H2O; filled symbols: DSS.

    Article Snippet: Contextual and cued fear conditioning were assessed (Med Associates mouse fear conditioning system (PMED-VFC-NIR-M, Med Associates, St. Albans, Vermont and Med Associates VideoFreeze automated scoring system).

    Techniques: Activity Assay